My Thoughts on Spirituality

A place to clear up the confusion that spirituality has become in our world.

I Saw The Golden Compass, Part IV

Posted by apostlepd on December 10, 2007

So there I was buying a ticket to the very first showing of The Golden Compass. I was somewhat anxious to get into the theater because of everything I had heard about the movie. As I was preparing to walk into the theater, I cleared my mind of everything I thought I was going to see in order to see the movie for exactly what it was. I didn’t want to judge it before I saw it, and I didn’t want to read into or assume anything based just on what I had heard. So here is my verdict on The Golden Compass: I enjoyed it and thought it was an excellent movie.

First, I’m sure you’re wondering about the whole “religious oppression” that is a huge factor in the books. Well, the group that is supposed to be “the Church” is nothing more than a generic governing body-a toned down approach from what the books portray. Actually, it is more than just a generic government, it appears from the movie that the “Magisterium” is the Government. They come complete with their own Police force, K-9 dogs, weapons, secret mechanical spy bugs, and everything. I’m sorry to say that I haven’t yet seen a religious group that has a police force (in the movie, the officers are called “Gobblers”). Needless to say, anyone who lives in America, with our separation of Church and state, will be totally unable to draw any parallels between the Magisterium and the Church. The character who is known as “The Authority” never appeared in the movie, but was mentioned a couple of times in an authoritative manner, but in no way were the references to “The Authority” spiritual, supernatural, deity-like, or godly in any way shape or form. (However, what the books say could be completely different…so watch out.)

(Let’s jump to the end for a moment to deal with one more issue concerning the Magisterium) As the movie ends, one of the witches is talking to Lee Scoresby, who is a pilot of sorts, and asks him if he has heard the prophesy of the war. She goes on to describe the war as one that will be over free will. The witch describes how the Magisterium is trying to control all people in all worlds and take away their free will. Lord Asriel, who is being held by the Magisterium at the end of the movie, if he has discovered a way to travel between the worlds, could possibly show the Magisterium how to get into these other worlds and then there would be no stopping the control the Magisterium would have. (Hopefully you followed that.)

With the mention of free will, you can think one of two things. First, you can think that this is a good sign that the Magisterium is going to end up paralleling a religious organization. However, then you’d have to reconcile the fact that God only gives free will, he doesn’t take it away–nor does any church I have ever known say they desire to end free will. If you went back a thousand plus years, you could possibly compare this mentality to the Roman Catholic Church that was one with the government, but it is too far a stretch to be any sort of modern day religious organization. Also, I have read many sources that say Pullman’s attempt was to attack the Catholic Church specifically. Secondly, you could view this “removing of free will” concept as merely the goal of an evil fantasy government organization, which it is and be at peace with The Golden Compass. I only need to say one more time that as the other movies are released, the foundation that has been established could indeed change into something else that is actually offensive, but to this point, it isn’t.

The Golden Compass is fantasy. Good guys and bad guys exist in a world where people’s souls walk alongside them in the form of animal personalities called “daemons” (pronounced “demons”). Polar bears are portrayed as the highest race of animals and exist as a fighting species fully equipped with body armor. By the way, the fighting polar bear scenes are the most exciting in the movie. As a note to parents, there is a bit of gore at one point, and when you meet the main polar bear character for the first time, he is a drunk. Another interesting thing is the mention of “Dust.” This is very vaguely explained but talked about quite often. Apparently the Magisterium is trying to conceal any existence of “Dust,” and at one point Lady Coulter (Nicole Kidman) explains that “Dust” is what happens when people disobey “The Authority.” She goes on to say that the Magisterium is trying to separate children’s “daemons” from them in order to keep the influence of “Dust” away. If that sounds confusing, it was confusing in the movie, too. Furthermore, the “Gobblers,” or police force, were actually stealing children by order of the Magisterium and sending them off to a medical-type research facility where “testing” was going on. Actually, they were performing the procedure of separating the daemons from the children.

Well, it is obvious from the movie that the Magisterium and Gobblers are the bad guys and Lyra (the main character) and the Gyptians (a group of renegade parents who are trying to protect the children from the Gobblers) are the good guys. The plot is very well done with the exception of the lingering problem of “Dust,” which I’m sure they’ll explain more as the trilogy continues. When the movie ends, it leaves no doubt that a second movie is in the works. Also, the religious boycott seemed to cause little disturbance. The Golden Compass grossed $26,125,000 opening weekend. Disney’s Enchanted was second place with a mere $10 million.

As I conclude my views on The Golden Compass, I have to say that it is pretty much impossible for anyone to come away from this movie with the impression that the Magisterium represents a religious organization much less the Church as we know it based on the movie alone. The only slight chance that could happen would be in the situation someone goes into the movie looking for something offensive and pairs the Magisterium with the Church only because they read a bunch of emails and heard a bunch of Christians talking about how the books were an attack on the Church. Parents can safely allow their older teens to watch this movie without wondering if they’re going to become atheists. But before going out to buy the books, be sure you read them first. The movie is said to be a “watered-down” version of the books.

Finally, while I enjoyed the movie thoroughly and thought the polar bears were incredibly entertaining, I am in no way saying that the trilogy as a whole will not at some point say, do, or imply some attack or condescension towards the Church nor am I saying the books are not anti-religious. Take the movie for what it is right now: Fantasy and Entertainment. I saw the Golden Compass and that’s all I have to say about it.

9 Responses to “I Saw The Golden Compass, Part IV”

  1. Matthew said

    Hey!

    I saw it on Saturday night. I agree with you very much, I thought it was a great film. I have written a bit about it over on my blog if you’d care to check it out. I will probably trackback to this post when I write my review of the movie tonight.

    Thanks for the great words!

    Matty
    mattythestranger.wordpress.com

  2. mattdabbs said

    I posted a link on my blog and a critique of your critique. Thanks for writing this.

  3. Mark said

    Hey Paul,

    Glad it was not as bad as many people have feared. From what I’ve read, the third book is where the more anti-God stuff is supposed to become the most prominent. We’ll see if the movies that follow go in that direction. Sounds like this first one was fairly harmless.

    Thanks for sharing!

    Mark <

  4. controlling chaos said

    I’ll have to check it it out. I’ve had my fair share of WARNINGS to see the movie. I’ve made this strong point to everyone I chat about the Golden Compass. ” If someone watches the movie and becomes an atheist, then they never believed in GOD in the first place.”

  5. Ray said

    Didn’t see it.
    Don’t think it’s good.
    Save your time and do something important.
    Who is this ‘God’ anyway?

    ~ think free ~ live free ~ be free ~

  6. apostlepd said

    This is a very enlightening link of an interview with Pullman:
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21595083/
    The Title: “Pullman not promoting atheism in ‘Golden Compass’”

  7. Amanda said

    I saw the movie on Sunday, and I too enjoyed it, although as someone who read and loved the books, I have to say that the ending completely dissapointed me. (It appears they went for the “happy ending” approach, and took the end of the first book and will place it at the beginning of the second movie. At least I hope that’s what they do. Kinda the opposite of what Peter Jackson did with the Lord of the Rings movies. He took the beginning the Two Towers and put it at the end of The Fellowship.)

    Anyway, you’re right about the movie being quite watered down. The books make it QUITE clear that the Magisterium is supposed to be a counter part to the Roman Catholic church, although since it is fantasy, I never felt threatened by the message in that regard, as I never felt that Pullman was attacking Christianity in general. More the system of a powerful organized religion capitalizing on the fear they produce in those they have power over. In the second and third book, yes, the heavenly beings become involved and are in league with the Magisterium. However, again, it is fantasy, and it the world Pullman paints is so utterly different from what the Bible states as truth and reality, that I never felt that he was attacking my beliefs in any way.

    Thanks for the critique, and I’m glad you enjoyed the movie. I’m thankful that they watered down the message personally, but I too am wondering how they will water down things in the second and third movies, as those books are much more philosophical than the first book is.

    ~Amanda

  8. john said

    hi

    thanks for the review

    why don;t you try this?

    replace the word ‘dust’ with the word ’sin’

    and read the review again

    eg “Magisterium is trying to separate children’s “demons” from them in order to keep the influence of “Sin” away”

    hopefully this clarifies it!

  9. Darlene said

    Some rambled thoughts. While I think you make some valid points, I do have to add this. While you say it is safe to allow our older teens to see this movie, the problem lies in the fact that this movie was marketed heavily to much younger children. Working in a K-2 school, I saw several children in this age group excited about the possibly of seeing this movie and then reading the books. If the movie is a watered down version of the books, I just can’t condone giving this man my money. I heard a teacher compare this movie to The Chronicles of Narnia. She said they killed Aslan, so what is the difference? My opinion, Aslan was willing to sacrifice himself and Aslan returned from death. While I may not be out there boycotting this movie and telling others not to watch it, I also can not promote it, endorse it or give him my money.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>